Nexus between Medical Healthcare Professionals and Pharmaceutical Companies : Boon or bane for Patients
What started as imparting education to medical healthcare professionals, regarding pharmaceutical products by various pharmaceutical companies, has now become a grave, giant problem in the category of bribery and to be more precise, corruption in this 21st century. Now detailing of pharmaceutical company product has included giving free physician’s sample packs, prescription pads, pen and includes an entire range of latest electronic gazettes of mobile phones, laptops, tablets, AC, Refrigerator, LED TV, sponsoring a conference, refreshment to all expenses like return air ticket with free boarding and lodging in national or international tourist spot or hilly area. The real problem is that nothing comes free; all these expenses will add to cost of medicines and medical fraternity will heed least to quality of medicine. Now the market is flooded with abundant, spurious, sub-standard medicines; as pharmaceutical companies have the confidence of selling these products by shelling huge, attractive offers/gifts to some of greedy doctors, who fall prey to their lucrative offers. In this article, the aim is to probe this association or rather; we can call nexus between the medical healthcare professionals and various pharmaceutical companies. Various aspects are covered in this article, like….How this association works? What is the modus operandi and rationale of this association? Various angles of this association; from medical healthcare professionals, medical councils, pharmaceutical companies and society point of views are covered.
2. Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry; CODE OF PRACTICE for the PHRMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY, 2016 together with the PRESCRIPTION MEDICINES CODE OF PRACTICE AUTHORITY Constitution and Procedure. 2016.
3. Baines, Donald A., “Problems Facing the Pharmaceutical Industry and Approaches to Ensure Long Term Viability” (2010). Master of Science in Organizational Dynamic Theses 33, University of Pennsylvania. hpp: // repository. Upenn.edu/od _theses _msod/33.
4. Bansal, R.K. and Das Sanjoy; “UNETHICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOCTORS AND DRUGS COMPANIES”, JIAFM 2005: 27 (1) ; pp 40-42.
5. Centre for Trade and Development (Centad), New Delhi ; Competition Law and Indian Pharmaceutical Industry; 2010.
6. Cynthia F. Kleppinger, CDER; Investigator Responsibilities – Regulation and Clinical Trials, FDA’S 2013 Clinical Investigator Training Course , November 13, 2013; 12- Kleppinger_CI Training_Nov_ 2013_final.
7. Ernst & Young; Pharmaceutical marketing: ethical and responsible conduct, A survey on effectiveness of the guidelines, September 2011.
8. Kirk B Johnson and David Orentlicher; Guidelines on Gifts to Physicians from Industry: An Update COUNCIL ON ETHICAL AND JUDICIAL AFFAIRS, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; Kirk B Johnson, American Medical Association and David Orentlicher, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, Vol. 47, October 9,1991.
9. KPMG Tax Flash News; Expenditure on Freebies are allowed as Business expenditure since MCI Regulations are not applicable to Pharma Companies; 20 January 2017.
10. KRC surveyofphysicians_1 ; Survey of Physicians About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Company Activities and Information; March 2011.
11. Marcia Angell; Drug Companies & Doctors : A Story of Corruption ; January 15 , 2009.
12. Maria de Molina, 54, 7a /28006 Madrid; CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY 2016, www.codigofarmaindustria .org.
13. P. Norris et.al; Drug promotion – What we know? What we have yet to learn? ; Reviews of materials in the WHO/ HAI database on drug promotion; World Health Organization and Health Action International 2005.
14. Sandhya Srinivasan, Consulting Editor, Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, freelance journalist and researcher, India; The Drug Industry and Doctors: An Unholy Alliance; (29/09/2017).
15. Saurabh Kumar Saxena, Department of Management, Rakshpal Bahadur Management Institute , Bareilly – 243001 , India. A review of marketing strategies work by different pharmaceutical companies, 10.1.1.512.3138; (29/09/2017).
16. Shahinul Alam et.al.; Ethical Relation between Physicians and Pharmaceutical Industries in the Perspectives of Bangladesh ; Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 2015 Vol.6 (1):1-5.
17. The George Washington University; Impacts of Pharmaceutical Marketing on Healthcare Services in the District of Columbia. Prepared by The George Washington University, School of Public Health and Health Services Washington , DC for the District of Columbia Department of Health; June 15 , 2009.